Reference Resources PDF Print E-mail
Written by The Cougars   
Sunday, 28 September 2014 05:25

HiTechnic & Matrix Controllers

FTC Motors

Build A Better Bot Workshops

Shop References
(courtesy of Bernez's Knifemaking Info Pages)

 

Attachments:
Download this file (AndyMark am-2964 NeveRest40.PDF)AndyMark am-2964 NeveRest40.PDF[ ]93 Kb01/10/14 08:02
Download this file (FTC Workshop - content - final.pptx)Build A Better Bot workshop[ ]9895 Kb25/10/14 18:43
Download this file (HiTechnic-Motor-Controller-Specification-v1.4.pdf)HiTechnic Motor Controller brief v1.4[ ]155 Kb10/10/14 13:16
Download this file (hitechnic_motor_controller_-_brief_v1.3.pdf)HiTechnic Motor Controller brief v1.3[ ]194 Kb10/10/14 13:16
Download this file (hitechnic_servo_controller_-_brief_v1.2.pdf)HiTechnic Servo Controller brief[ ]168 Kb01/10/14 07:18
Download this file (MATRIX-Controller-Specification-v1.2.pdf)MATRIX Motor Controller Specification[ ]165 Kb09/10/14 09:18
Download this file (MATRIX_HTMotor_Spec_v2.pdf)MATRIX HT-Motor[ ]250 Kb02/10/14 08:53
Download this file (MATRIX_Motor_Spec_v2.pdf)MATRIX Motor[ ]245 Kb02/10/14 08:52
Download this file (tap_and_drill_chart_-_english.pdf)Tap & Drill Chart - English sizes[ ]115 Kb01/10/14 08:14
Download this file (Tetrix_DC_Motor_V1.pdf)Tetrix DC Motor[ ]122 Kb01/10/14 08:01
Download this file (Tetrix_DC_Motor_V2.pdf)Tetrix DC Motor V2[ ]1983 Kb01/10/14 08:02
Last Updated on Thursday, 30 October 2014 13:53
 
Servo Stall Currents PDF Print E-mail
Written by Evan Hollins   
Tuesday, 30 September 2014 17:23

A big rule change this year added the ability to use as big of a servo as possible while still staying under 5 amps per servo controller at stall. Unfortunately, many of the servos we commonly use didn't have documented stall currents. To find these, we contacted ServoCity™ and asked them what to do. They were able to talk to HiTec© and retrieve stall currents for many of the servos that they make. Here they are in a table shown below. 

We would like to thank ServoCity and HiTec for helping not just us but all of FTC! 

For Analog Servos:

SERVO

 

STALL CURRENT @ 4.8V

STALL CURRENT @ 6V

    

HS-35

 

360mA

430mA

HS-40

 

460mA

580mA

HS-45

 

440mA

 

HS-53

 

440mA

550mA

HS-55

 

440mA

550mA

HS-65

 

960mA

1200mA

HS-70

 

960mA

1250mA

HS-81/82

 

1450mA

1800mA

HS-311

 

700mA

800mA

HS-322

 

700mA

800mA

HS-485

 

1000mA

1200mA

HS-625

 

1600mA

2000mA

HS-645

 

1600mA

2000mA

HS-755

 

1500mA

1800mA

HS-765

 

1500mA

1800mA

HS-785

 

1500mA

1800mA

HS-805

 

4800mA

6000mA

HS-1425CR

 

640mA

800mA

 

 For Digital Servos: 

SERVO

 

STALL CURRENT @ 4.8V

STALL CURRENT @ 6V

HS-5035

 

360mA

430mA

HS-5055

 

500mA

700mA

HS-5065

 

960mA

1200mA

HS-5070

 

1000mA

1300mA

HS-5085

 

1700mA

2150mA

HS-5087

  

1450mA

HS-5485

 

1000mA

1200mA

HS-5495/96

 

1200mA

1400mA

HS-5565

  

2100mA

HS-5585

  

2100mA

HS-5625/45

  

2100mA

HS-5665/85

  

2100mA

HS-7235/45

  

1300mA

Attachments:
Download this file (2013_HRU_ServoMat_2.pdf)HiTec Servo Product Table[ ]3531 Kb01/10/14 07:22
Last Updated on Tuesday, 30 September 2014 21:29
 
World Championship Update PDF Print E-mail
Written by Joey   
Tuesday, 22 April 2014 22:17

We have just arrived in St. Louis, pulling up right in front of the NASA trailer! Wednesday is load in and judging, and Thursday, Friday, and Saturday are matches. Looking forward to seeing all of our friends from around the world and playing robots! We are in the Edison Division (will probably be listed as division 2 on the live stream page).

Live streams to all of the FTC events will be posted here.

 http://www3.usfirst.org/roboticsprograms/ftc/ftclive

Good luck to everyone competing this week! 

 

Last Updated on Friday, 10 October 2014 16:50
 
Build a Better Bot Workshop with Patronum Bots PDF Print E-mail
Written by The Cougars   
Wednesday, 18 September 2013 08:33

On August 31st we got together with the Patronum Bots at their home base in East Troy, Wisconsin to put on our Build a Better Bot workshop. It was an all day event, and 12 teams attended, coming from Wisconsin and surrounding states. Throughout the day, we discussed topics such as game and robot analysis, mechanical and wiring practices, and static electricity. Along with topics about the robot, we also went over scouting and showed teams how we pick teams at tournaments. Near the end of the day, we held an “open work time” with several stations of hands-on activities. These included double drilling channel, creating static spray, switching from tamiya connections to anderson powerpoles, and making static detectors.

Check out the videos in the Build a Better Bot workshop playlist created by the Patronum Bots. 

 

 

Attachments:
Download this file (FTC Workshop Wisconsin.pptx)FTC Workshop Wisconsin.pptx[The slide deck from our Build a Better Bot workshop, August 31 2013, in East Troy WI]96876 Kb13/09/13 08:38
Last Updated on Monday, 07 October 2013 07:48
 
Build a Better Bot workshop handouts & useful info PDF Print E-mail
Written by Jamie Diamond   
Monday, 16 September 2013 22:31

Attachments:
Download this file (HiTechnic Motor Controller Brief v1.3.pdf)HiTechnic Motor Controller Brief v1.3.pdf[ ]194 Kb16/09/13 22:36
Download this file (HiTechnic Servo Controller Brief v1.2.pdf)HiTechnic Servo Controller Brief v1.2.pdf[ ]168 Kb16/09/13 22:36
Download this file (HiTechnic Servo Controller Power Limits.pdf)HiTechnic Servo Controller Power Limits.pdf[ ]115 Kb16/09/13 22:36
Download this file (HS-485HB Servo - A.pdf)HS-485HB Servo - A.pdf[ ]182 Kb16/09/13 22:37
Download this file (HS-485HB Servo - B.pdf)HS-485HB Servo - B.pdf[ ]829 Kb16/09/13 22:41
Download this file (Motor Power Chart.pdf)Motor Power Chart.pdf[ ]29 Kb16/09/13 22:37
Download this file (TETRIX DC Motor Specs.pdf)TETRIX DC Motor Specs.pdf[ ]122 Kb16/09/13 22:37
Last Updated on Monday, 16 September 2013 22:41
 
«StartPrev12345678910NextEnd»

Page 1 of 21
Copyright © 2015 cougarrobot.com. All Rights Reserved.
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.
 

FTC Blog

FIRST Tech Challenge
The official FTC Blog
  • 3D Printing for FIRST Teams (3 of 8)

    3D Printing for FIRST Teams


    Authors: Kari Karwedsky, PTC, and Colm Prendergast, Mentor for FIRST Robotics Competition Team 1965

    3D Printing Work Flow


    The 3D Printing Work Flow that we use is composed of 7 steps.  

    Step 1: Design your part using PTC Creo.
    Step 2: Export Model from PTC Creo in .stl format.
    Step 3: Prepare Model and Generate g-code file (or equivalent) for the printer.
    Step 4: Prepare and Level the 3D Printer Build Plate.
    Step 5: Load printer filament.
    Step 6: Print Model.
    Step 7: Clean up printed model.

    In this blog post, we will look more closely at Step 1.

    3D Printing Step 1: Design your part using PTC Creo

    Most people reading this blog are probably familiar with using PTC Creo or another CAD program. Designing parts for 3D printing is a pretty straightforward process in PTC Creo. Most designs can be done using basic extrude and sketch functions to create different geometry. PTC Creo is an easy tool to use for this purpose. Using PTC’s training materials novices can learn to do this in no time. For an introduction to PTC Creo, please download the PTC Academic Team's latest curriculum, "How to Model Almost Anything" (http://apps.ptc.com/schools/How_to_model_almost_anything.zip

    When designing a part there are several things to consider. The 3D printing process imposes some limitations that should be considered. The first of these is that the plastic is extruded as a narrow bead; the image below is an illustration of how the extruded layers are built up. 
    3D Print Layer Construction (Source: http://i.imgur.com/DwNysSF.png)

    Each layer has a finite width which needs to be accounted for when drawing your model. Effectively, any outside and inside dimensions need to be adjusted to account for the layer width. The outside dimensions of a model will tend to be larger than drawn; inside dimensions will tend to be smaller than drawn. This is especially true for parts that are expected to fit seamlessly with other parts (e.g. shafts and bores). The following image illustrates the impact of extruded line width on your models.
    Impact of 3D Printed Layer Width on Drawn Dimensions of Inner (Shaft) and Outer (Bore) shapes

    In this case there are two models that are intended to be connected together such as a shaft and bore.  The inner shaft has to be drawn with a smaller diameter so the final printed diameter is the correct size. The outer bore model has to be drawn with a larger diameter so that the final printer diameter is the correct size. The amount of correction necessary will be printer and setup dependent. The most straightforward way to estimate the correction necessary is to draw and print some calibration steps. The way that this was accomplished by the team was to design a hub with a bore hole and key to match the 1/2in output shaft of an AndyMark ToughBox gearbox (http://www.andymark.com/ToughBox-p/am-toughbox.htm). After leveling and setting up our printer (more on this later) we designed a shape with a 1/2in bore hole and printed the part. You can download the PTC Creo CAD file (shaft_size_test_0p50_bore.prt) in the accompanying PTC Community document (http://communities.ptc.com/docs/DOC-6545). 

    Once printed the bore inner diameter and key way were measured with a calipers. The printed diameter was 0.49”, this was 0.01” smaller than designed and would not fit the ToughBox shaft. The model was modified to increase the diameter by 0.01” to 0.51” and re-printed. The modified design fit perfectly. You can download the PTC Creo CAD file (shaft_size_test_0p51_bore.prt) in the accompanying PTC Community document (http://communities.ptc.com/docs/DOC-6545). 

    This experiment provided the calibration information necessary to adjust model dimensions to ensure accurate printed dimensions i.e. any shaft or protrusion structure or outer dimensions (diameter, width) should be undersized by 0.01” or 0.005” per side. Any bore or hole structure or inner dimensions (diameter, width) should be oversized by 0.01” or 0.005” per side.

    Another thing to consider when drawing a part is the sequence in which that part will be printed. The 3D printer will print the part from the bottom to the top. Therefore, when creating a design it is a good idea to ensure that to the extent possible the bottom sections of the model should support the upper sections as the part is printed i.e. the widest part of the model should be at the bottom and any internal surfaces should be supported with arch structures where possible. When printing un-supported structures the Printer software can usually insert supports which can be removed after printing. Careful placement of the model on the printer build plate can also minimize the need for supports. This will be discussed in more detail later. Here are some example shapes.
    Example Shapes on a 3D Printer

    In the example robot custom tank track system design, an example where this needed to be considered was the Drive Sprocket Wheel. This was a relatively complicated part and there was no optimal way to print it as one part. Therefore it was split into two identical parts which were bolted together as part of the assembly process. One of these is illustrated below. The part was printed with the widest section closest to the build plate, no supports were needed which resulted in a clean print.
    PTC Creo Model of half of the Drive Sprocket Wheel (Different Views)

    Although the 3D printed line widths can be quite small (0.5mm) it is generally recommended not to try print really small parts or parts with really small features. There are no really hard and fast rules here. However, at a minimum any features need to be strong enough to support the stress of being printed i.e. the movement of the print head/extruder depositing plastic on a model will create stress on the parts of the model that have already being built. This can result in new layers not adhering to layers that have already being printed which will result in the print failing. When designing features we would generally recommended avoiding volumes that are less than 0.25” on a side. While more artistic creations can use smaller features (there are lots of impressive examples of this) in most FRC applications the parts are going to be functional and will need to be strong enough for use on robots. In addition to the Tank Tread system team 1965 has used 3D printer parts as part of our 2014 competition robot. Several of these parts were structural components of our shooter system. They needed to be very strong and did not fail during the competition season. Some of these components are highlighted on the team's 2014 competition robot, “Squeaky” in the image below.
    FRC Team 1965's 2014 competition robot "Squeaky"

    In the above image the four highlighted components experienced significant stresses during robot operation. In particular the Shooter CAM and Motor Mount were an integral part of our shooter mechanism. 

    If there are ever concerns about whether a particular feature will be printed correctly it is often useful to create a model with just that feature to test out the printing process before attempting to print a much larger model.  An example might be helpful. This will also illustrate the oversize/undersize discussion from earlier. Suppose we need to create parts with a shaft and bore that are supposed to connect. The shaft diameter is 0.5”. Here is the Shaft example. In this case the shaft diameter is drawn as 0.49”based on the previous print calibration exercise.
    Shaft example
    PTC Creo CAD file (shaft_example.prt) can be downloaded from (http://communities.ptc.com/docs/DOC-6545). 

    Here is the matching Bore part. The Bore diameter is drawn as 0.51”.
    Bore or hub example

    PTC Creo CAD file (hub_example.prt) can be downloaded from (http://communities.ptc.com/docs/DOC-6545). 

    The assembly showing the two parts is shown below.
    Shaft and bore assembly
    PTC Creo CAD file (shaft_hub_example.asm) can be downloaded from (http://communities.ptc.com/docs/DOC-6545). 

    Finally, it is often helpful to round any square edges on your model. Remember that when your print is complete it will be stuck to your printer plate or a raft (more about this later) and will need to be removed before it can be used. This can be accomplished using a variety of tools including spatulas, craft knives etc. At the very least you will need to lift a corner of your model as part of the process of removing your model from the build plate or raft. Rounding the bottom edges of your model will make this really easy without compromising its structure.
    Part with Rounded and Square Edges

    More generally, it is a good idea to round corners where possible to improve the strength of your model features. This can generally be accomplished quite easily.
    Rounded Edge to re-enforce model weak points

    CAD Files

    CAD Files for this section can be found on the accompanying PTC Community document (http://communities.ptc.com/docs/DOC-6545) in the attachment, 3D_printing_blog_section3CAD.zip.  The CAD files include

    • 0.5” Bore Hole Test: shaft_size_test_0p50_bore.prt 
    • 0.51” Bore Hole Test: shaft_size_test_0p51_bore.prt 
    • 0.5” Shaft Example: shaft_example.prt 
    • 0.5” Bore Example: hub_example.prt 
    • 0.5” Assembled Shaft/Bore Example: shaft_hub_example.asm